Sunday, October 29, 2017

EXTRACT FROM MY THESIS ON, NEGATIVE ETHNICITY, A PASTORAL APPROACH, 2007/8 PEV a Case Study Kibera Slums

4.0 RECOMMENDATION
4.1.1 Ujamaa as a tool for healing in a community divided by negative ethnicity.
The example of Tanzanian communities that was founded by Mwalimu Nyerere should steer us in this research to find lasting solutions to this pastoral challenge of negative ethnicity in the church and the nation of Kenya. Once you fail to reach a census its good to seek a neighbour's input. 
Everything depends on how the Church plays her great role towards healing the rifts created by tribal hatred within her Christian communities, families towards renewal of human nature, witness, public proclaim, holistic acceptance, adaption to the outward sign. Nyerere, during question and Answer session following his visit at Mary knoll address in New York in 1970, used the same criterion for implementing social reform when he commented:
The church sometimes because of the language we are using…wants to be on the careful side and watch us. So first of all, let me say the church is a local church for us…The Church has methods of judging whether this is right or wrong. If you find, you know, that what they are doing is establishing a system whereby they sacrifice and kill men, you know it’s wrong. But if these fellows are talking about building cooperatives, building a new kind of society where people can live together for their own good, I think the church can always say “it sounds all right”[1]

This distinction between principles and action was also underlined by Bishop Christopher Mwoleka of Rulenge, Tanzania:
 “But these principles of the Church do nothing more than to point to the directions where ACTIONS must be directed. But actions themselves must be forthcoming; otherwise these principles remain without effect. Principles become effective only when they are applied by deliberate actions to concrete existing situations”[2]

Nyerere maintained that the individual and the families were rich or poor according to whether the whole tribe is rich or poor[3]. Nobody starved from either food or human dignity because he lacked personal wealth but he could depend on the wealth possessed by the community of which he was a member. That is the spirit of socialism[4]. It was from this cultural heritage that Tanzanian socialism developed. Nyerere strongly emphasized:
We are not improving a foreign ideology in Tanzania and trying to smother out distinct social patterns with it. We have deliberately decided to grow, a society out of our own roots, but in a particular direction and towards a particular kind of objective. We are doing this by emphasizing certain characteristics of our traditional organization, and extending them so that they can embrace the possibilities of modern technology and enable us to meet the challenge of life in the 20th Century world[5].

Nyerere stressed that Ujamaa as a family hood that describes socialism not to be compared with capitalism where building of a happy society depended solely on the exploitation of man by man; survival for the fittest mentality. It is an extended family, seeing people as brethren, as members of their ever-widening family. Ujamaa has a foundation that builds on our past[6].
The Swahili word Ujamaa was chosen by Nyerere to describe his socialism because it “emphasizes the Africanness of the policies we intend to follow” and because it literally means family hood, bringing to mind the people’s idea of mutual involvement in the family as we know it[7].
The church in Kenya requires a new paradigm shift in her pastoral/catechetical strategies, where faith must be lived not merely believed, Christians should not feel comfortable zones but  war zone, if the faith of Christians is not casting them nothing, its time they examined their motives and commitment.
The issues dealt with in this research are complex and require a deep pastoral discernment involving all stake holders in coming up with lasting solutions to negative ethnicity.
The most endangered species on earth today is the family that is being split apart by this enemy of negative ethnicity.The church in Africa finds herself entangled in wars:  Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) wars, the 1994 Rwanda’s genocide, Zimbabwe with the ‘big man’ syndrome, Somalia’s instabilities due to Islamic radicalism and terrorism menace and the list is endless.
The challenges may be overwhelming, but these should become opportunities for the Church to make a new paradigm shift in her approaches to models of evangelization that purifies cultures which do not promote cultural intolerance but fundamentalism. All Christians should be led by the Holy Spirit which fills the whole family, discerning deeply the events and longing of each man, what today we call the signs of times. This should be a culture that ought to be used in the anthro-political pedagogy in the AMECEA region, more so in the context of local Kenyan Church. 
The first announcement, the catechized and the christian formation, owes a lot to do with psycho social reality of the mission. The emphasis of inspiring the faith and development of the faithful believers to embrace fraternal brotherhood. The statement made by the bishop delegates to the African Synod from East Africa, described the new context for the Church as marked by: global economic crisis, poor governance, electoral violence, corruption, environmental crisis, violent conflicts, persistence of HIV/AIDS pandemic, lack of self-reliance and the need for capacity-building on the side of Church personnel and institution.[8]
In tracing the history of the political use of the word Ujamaa, Fred Burke says that Ujamaa is essentially a metaphysical statement of humanistic value which is sufficiently imprecise and flexible to provide justification for almost any government policy[9]. For Nyerere Ujamaa/socialism is an attitude of mind needed to ensure that people care for each other’s welfare.[10]
A socialist society can only be built by those who believe in, and who themselves practice, the principles of socialism.[11] It’s not the wealth a person possess but the attitude of mind that makes them socialists. A poor person may be a potential capitalist, an exploiter of others while a millionaire, in theory, could be a socialist.[12]. All these have great factors of communication, not only to transmit the message but to integrate the message and interiorizing it in life. The message has to be codified and de-codified for better understanding.
Nyerere noted that whoever tries to “exploit” another is not a true socialist, for in Ujamaa there is no place for racialism, tribalism, religious intolerance or discrimination.[13] The extended family must go even further to embrace the whole human kind.[14] Ujamaa’s stress on human equality also means Tanzania is trying to build a classless society:
We aim at building a classless society for one reason. In no state is there enough wealth to satisfy the desire of a single individual for power and prestige. Consequently, the moment the wealth is divorced from its purpose, which is the banishment of poverty, there develops a ruthless competition between individuals; each person tries to get more wealth simply so that he will have more power, and more prestige, than his fellows. Wealth becomes an instrument of domination, a means of humiliating other people[15].

Nyerere also categorically opposed violent means of to reaching a consus or coercion. Sometimes it is the only way “to break the power of those who prevent progress towards socialism.”[16] This to Nyerere is a case of southern Africa, (Mozambique, Rhodesia, Angola, and South Africa).
Tanzania cannot deny support, for to do so would be to deny the validity of African freedom and African dignity. We are naturally and inevitably allies of the freedom fighters. We may decide, as we have decided that no Tanzanian will take part in these wars; we may recognize the fact that we cannot arm the freedom fighters. But we can’t call for freedom in Southern Africa, and at the same time deny all assistance to those who are fighting for it, when we know, as well as they do, every other means of achieving freedom has been excluded by those now in power[17].

According to Nyerere, human equality as exemplified by the extended family goes beyond the tribe, the community and the nation. A true African socialist can look at a line on a map and say, “ the people on this side of the line are my brothers but those who happen to live on the other side have no claim on me; every individual on this continent is his brother.”[18] Because it is rooted in traditional values rather than historical necessity, Ujamaa is a pragmatic reality. 
Nyerere stated that there is no magical formula and no short cut to socialism. We can only grope our way forward doing our best to think clearly and scientifically about our own conditions in relation to our objectives.[19]Everything has to be interiorized in the mind, heart  and in the true understanding of christian community which has integrated the message into human development. The sense of life, motivation and orientation of each individual within a community. The catechetical science has to go in line with evangelization with clear themes of proper evangelization skills, catechesis contextualized, illumination and purification of culture and mystagogy in a manner that is pedagogical, systematic and anthropological in nature of  the Kenyan local Church.




[1] Wlliam Redman Duggan, et John R. Civille, Tanzania and Nyerere, a Study of Ujamaa and Nationhood, Orbis Books, Maryknoll, New York, 1976, 169
[2] Christopher Mwoleka, Nation- Building in Vatican II as Applied to Tanzania, Rulenga, Tanzania, Bishop’s House, September 1970, 12
[3] Julius Nyerere, Ujamaa: Essays on Socialism, Dar-es-salaam, Oxford University Press, 1968, 1
[4] Ibid, 3
[5] Julius Nyerere, Freedom and Socialism, Dar-es-salaam, Oxford University Press, 1968, 2
[6] Ibid, 2
[7] Ibid, 2
[8] www.mafrome.org/Cisa18_synod_africa.htm- “Kenya: Statement of East Africa Bishops- Delegate to African Synod,” no. 2-3
[9] Fred G. Burke, “Tanganyika: The Search for Ujamaa,” in African Socialism, (ed) William H. Friedland, and Curl.S Rosberg, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1964, 195-204
[10] Nyerere, Ujamaa: Essays on Socialism, 1
[11] Ibid, 17
[12] Ibid, 4
[13] Nyerere and socialism, 30
[14] Ibid, 29
[15] Julius, K. Nyerere, Freedom and Unity, Dar-es-salaam, Oxford University Press, 1966, 207
[16] Nyerere and Socialism, 24
[17] Julius K. Nyerere, Stability and change in Africa, Toronto University, October 2nd 1969, Vital speeches 36 November 1, 1969
[18] Nyerere, Ujamaa: Essays on Socialism, 12
[19] Nyerere, Freedom and Socialism, 19

No comments:

Post a Comment

GIVING LIFE TO THE NEW UNDERSTANDING OF EVANGELIZATION ( Evangelii Gaudium)

      II LEZIONE   1. Finalità di EG: dare vita ad una nuova tappa evangelizzatrice 1.1. Avendo presente la tematica sviluppata ...